<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Storage Virtualization, SNIA Piffle… and&#8230; oh, Good News!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.matrixstore.net/2008/09/09/storage-virtualization-snia-piffle%e2%80%a6-and-oh-good-news/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.matrixstore.net/2008/09/09/storage-virtualization-snia-piffle%e2%80%a6-and-oh-good-news/</link>
	<description>Protect your digital archive forever</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 10:57:21 +0100</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon</title>
		<link>http://www.matrixstore.net/2008/09/09/storage-virtualization-snia-piffle%e2%80%a6-and-oh-good-news/comment-page-1/#comment-204</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2008 10:01:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.matrixstore.net/?p=137#comment-204</guid>
		<description>Hi Rick: 

You are right: better to at least try and be a force for better definitions than to merely complain. I will try and turn my hand to emend the current SV definition.

However, I do hang on to the (albeit empirical) belief that the definitions written are dominated by insiders with their own agendas rather than by independents. Maybe that isn&#039;t borne out in reality? Or maybe that is an inevitablity.

Keep up the good work trying to define terms, we need you!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Rick: </p>
<p>You are right: better to at least try and be a force for better definitions than to merely complain. I will try and turn my hand to emend the current SV definition.</p>
<p>However, I do hang on to the (albeit empirical) belief that the definitions written are dominated by insiders with their own agendas rather than by independents. Maybe that isn&#8217;t borne out in reality? Or maybe that is an inevitablity.</p>
<p>Keep up the good work trying to define terms, we need you!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick Bauer</title>
		<link>http://www.matrixstore.net/2008/09/09/storage-virtualization-snia-piffle%e2%80%a6-and-oh-good-news/comment-page-1/#comment-203</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick Bauer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2008 20:00:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.matrixstore.net/?p=137#comment-203</guid>
		<description>Jon:

Thanks the feedback on the SNIA dictionary term for virtualization; I run the dictionary for SNIA, and we are always looking to improve it. Give me your virt. suggestion for the next round of updates. Contrary to your article, we don&#039;t limit any submissions to vendors or independents, so we welcome your contributions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jon:</p>
<p>Thanks the feedback on the SNIA dictionary term for virtualization; I run the dictionary for SNIA, and we are always looking to improve it. Give me your virt. suggestion for the next round of updates. Contrary to your article, we don&#8217;t limit any submissions to vendors or independents, so we welcome your contributions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
